Course syllabus adopted 2021-02-17 by Head of Programme (or corresponding).
Overview
- Swedish nameMiljöpolitiska styrmedel
- CodeUNA016
- Credits7.5 Credits
- OwnerMPTSE
- Education cycleSecond-cycle
- Main field of studyEnergy and Environmental Systems and Technology, Industrial Engineering and Management, Chemical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
- DepartmentSPACE, EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT
- GradingTH - Pass with distinction (5), Pass with credit (4), Pass (3), Fail
Course round 1
- Teaching language English
- Application code 28113
- Block schedule
- Open for exchange studentsYes
Credit distribution
Module | Sp1 | Sp2 | Sp3 | Sp4 | Summer | Not Sp | Examination dates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0105 Examination 6 c Grading: TH | 6 c |
| |||||
| 0205 Examples class 1.5 c Grading: UG | 1.5 c |
In programmes
- MPSES - SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS, MSC PROGR, Year 1 (elective)
- MPTSE - INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, MSC PROGR, Year 1 (compulsory elective)
- TSILO - INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS, Year 3 (compulsory elective)
Examiner
- Thomas Sterner
Eligibility
General entry requirements for Master's level (second cycle)Applicants enrolled in a programme at Chalmers where the course is included in the study programme are exempted from fulfilling the requirements above.
Specific entry requirements
English 6 (or by other approved means with the equivalent proficiency level)Applicants enrolled in a programme at Chalmers where the course is included in the study programme are exempted from fulfilling the requirements above.
Course specific prerequisites
Basic knowledge in environmental science or environmental engineering. Preferably some prior knowledge of economics.Aim
This course is intended to give sufficient insight in applied environmental economics for the students to contribute to a discussion in e.g. companies or regulatory authorities, concerning the design of policies in the area of environmental and natural resource management. In addition, the course aims to provide practical training in this type of discussion and advocacy in Swedish as well as international contexts.Learning outcomes (after completion of the course the student should be able to)
- Describe and analyze how the market mechanism works, through supply and demand functions that interact to form prices. This is necessary background to be able to analyze the market failures that underlie environmental problems.
- describe and analyze how environmental policy instruments work;
- describe the influence of a certain policy instrument both on incentives for technical change and on the distribution of costs in connection to environmental improvement;
- in a professional role, relate to the political game around policies and be prepared for pressure that different firms or other polluters can use to accomplish their agenda concerning policy choices.
- evaluate how policies should be selected and designed so as to meet not only the criteria of efficiency but also of equity, political feasibility and other criteria.
- Relate one's own perspective on fairness to that of decision makers in other parts of the world with regards to issues of distribution and feasibilty and how this can be combined with an economic analysis of efficiency. The student can problematize around how to combine efficiency and feasibilty in the design of e.g. international climate agreements.
Content
Market mechanism through supply and demand functions that interact to form prices. Market failures that underlie environmental problems. The course will give an overview of why economic policies are needed in the area of pollution and resource management as well as a survey of the policy instruments that are available. It will also explain theories of policy selection and design. Considerable attention will be paid to integrating economic modeling with actual issues in real economies. The course will be based on Sterner and Coria (2012). Principles for a fair distribution of the global responsibility that is being negotiated in the international climate negotiations is brought up through a perspective shifting exchange with students from other parts of the world.Organisation
We strive to use engaging and modern teaching methods in this course. We use case studies and exercises without abandoning traditional material such as articles and a textbook. Much of the lecture material is "flipped", i.e., the students watch short clips as a complement to reading before coming to class, and the understanding of the covered material will then be deepened in the classroom through the use of discussions, group work, quizzes, exercises and other pedagogical tools. A portable computer or a mobile phone are required to do the quizzes in class. We also aim to do an exercise that is carried out in collaboration with students from developing countries or emerging market economies about climate change burden sharing.The case study is a project in lobbying. It is compulsory to participate in the project and and the presentation.
Literature
Sterner, T. and J. Coria (2012). Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management. Second Edition. Resources for the Future, Routledge Taylor& Francis Group. Additional articles.Examination including compulsory elements
The examination consists of a case study (lobbying project) and a written exam. The case study may give maximum 20 points. The exam is composed of several questions and may give maximum 80 points. Thus, the maximum for the case study and the exam is 100 points in total. In addition, 2 bonus points for being engaged in 75% or more of all the discussion forums can be added to the total point. Note: These bonus points can be used only to get higher grades, not to get a pass grade (3).
In order to get grade
3 you must have at least 50 points in total (bonus points not counted),
4 you must have at least 60 points in total,
5 you must have at least 80 points in total.
Examination for PhD students will be decided on a case by case basis and generally involve the writing of a paper.
The course examiner may assess individual students in other ways than what is stated above if there are special reasons for doing so, for example if a student has a decision from Chalmers on educational support due to disability.