Course syllabus adopted 2022-02-21 by Head of Programme (or corresponding).
Overview
- Swedish nameArkitektur och stadsbyggande: En kulturhistorisk orientering
- CodeATH100
- Credits7.5 Credits
- OwnerTISAM
- Education cycleFirst-cycle
- Main field of studyArchitecture
- ThemeMTS 7.5 c
- DepartmentARCHITECTURE AND CIVIL ENGINEERING
- GradingUG - Pass, Fail
Course round 1
- Teaching language Swedish
- Application code 61112
- Maximum participants207
- Open for exchange studentsNo
Credit distribution
Module | Sp1 | Sp2 | Sp3 | Sp4 | Summer | Not Sp | Examination dates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0103 Written and oral assignments 7.5 c Grading: UG | 4 c | 3.5 c |
In programmes
- MTS - Humans, Technology, Society, Year 1
- TISAM - CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, Year 3 (elective)
- TKSAM - CIVIL ENGINEERING, Year 3 (elective)
Examiner
Johan Linton- Associate Professor, Architectural Theory and Method, Architecture and Civil Engineering
Eligibility
General entry requirements for bachelor's level (first cycle)Applicants enrolled in a programme at Chalmers where the course is included in the study programme are exempted from fulfilling the requirements above.
Specific entry requirements
The same as for the programme that owns the course.Applicants enrolled in a programme at Chalmers where the course is included in the study programme are exempted from fulfilling the requirements above.
Course specific prerequisites
Swedish.Aim
The aim is to give an introduction to the architecture and the city, to their history and their role in the development of society and culture, together one of the most fundamental expressions of the relation between man, technology and society. The course - offers a basic orientation to future engineers regarding the history of architecture, city and infrastructure, and its influence on contemporary building. - provides tools for understanding and interpreting the built environment and shows how its history and tradition has a direct and indirect relation to contemporary everyday life. - offers a platform for exchange and collaboration between technology and culture, also regarding sustainability and equality. - gives opportunities to students from different programs to meet and collaborate through exercises and seminars. - provides a freedom of choice when it comes to the subjects the students would like to study.Learning outcomes (after completion of the course the student should be able to)
Discuss and reflect upon architecture as a manifestation of the relationship between human, technology and society.
Compare building today with building in history and discuss problems and possibilities of the future in relation to society, technology and culture.
Describe a number of cities, buildings and architects from different periods in history which have been important and has influence today.
Give constructive critique regarding written and oral presentations of buildings and cities - i.e training in communication
Content
The course introduces important references in the history of architecture and town planning and relate them to contemporary culture in overview and in detail. The history of architecture is presented in relation to its relevance to contemporary problems regarding technical, social and aesthetic sustainability.
Organisation
The course consists of lectures, seminars, writing exercises, group exercises and a city excursion.
Literature
Mandatory:
Michael Fazio, Marian Moffett, Lawrence Wodehouse, A World History of Architecture
(Thames and Hudson, 2013 ¿ även andra / tidigare upplagor av boken går bra)
Reference books:
Cecilia Björk, Lars Nordling & Laila Reppen, Så byggdes staden
(4 uppl 2018)
Claes Caldenby, Gunilla Linde Bjur & Sven-Olof Ohlsson, Guide till Göteborgs arkitektur
(Formas, 2006)
Ola Nylander, Svensk bostadsarkitektur, utveckling från 1800-tal till 2000-tal (Studentlitteratur, 2018)
Examination including compulsory elements
To pass it is required to participate in an active way in the different course activities and to produce approved reports, essays and presentations.
The course examiner may assess individual students in other ways than what is stated above if there are special reasons for doing so, for example if a student has a decision from Chalmers on educational support due to disability.