Course syllabus adopted 2021-02-02 by Head of Programme (or corresponding).
Overview
- Swedish nameDen byggda miljöns värde
- CodeARK660
- Credits15 Credits
- OwnerTAFFS
- Education cycleFirst-cycle
- Main field of studyCivil and Environmental Engineering
- DepartmentARCHITECTURE AND CIVIL ENGINEERING
- GradingTH - Pass with distinction (5), Pass with credit (4), Pass (3), Fail
Course round 1
- Teaching language Swedish
- Application code 60121
- Maximum participants45
- Open for exchange studentsNo
- Only students with the course round in the programme overview.
Credit distribution
Module | Sp1 | Sp2 | Sp3 | Sp4 | Summer | Not Sp | Examination dates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0117 Project 15 c Grading: TH | 15 c |
In programmes
Examiner
Nina Ryd- Professor, Building Design, Architecture and Civil Engineering
Eligibility
General entry requirements for bachelor's level (first cycle)Applicants enrolled in a programme at Chalmers where the course is included in the study programme are exempted from fulfilling the requirements above.
Specific entry requirements
The same as for the programme that owns the course.Applicants enrolled in a programme at Chalmers where the course is included in the study programme are exempted from fulfilling the requirements above.
Course specific prerequisites
ARK530 - Property and contract law, BOM225 - Management and organisation in the construction sector, TEK525 - Accounting and financial management, MVE491 - Mathematics, statistics and methods or equivalent courses.Aim
The overall aim of the course is to provide basic understanding of values and value chains based on the outcomes from architecture and civil engineering processes. Starting from whose perspective one takes, one can distinguish between the general, professional and individual values relating to aspects of the built environment. The course aims at developing a fundamental understanding of, and strategic skills in, developing the built environment and insights in that there is not a given measure or a uniform terminology of how values are made or can be made.Learning outcomes (after completion of the course the student should be able to)
- Give examples of how value creation occurs in the planning, design and facilities management processes.
- Understand the conditions in the pre-design phase/front-end management: how they are planned and by whom.
- Describe the construction clients' role's functions and responsibilities and value drivers' clients may control.
- Explain the differences in the creation of value by using properties: both, in a market and also from a business scope perspective.
- Understand the relationship between economic, historical and social aspects and the dynamics of change in the built environment, as well as insight into the importance of planning and the opportunities it brings in relation to other approaches and forces of change.
- Explain how/if trade-offs can be done, what is valued in counter to given constraints and points of departure.
- Using and explain concepts such as cost, fair value, potential value, present value, market value, return value, book value, insurance value, semantic values, willingness to pay, usability, public values, architectural-, heritage- and functional values as well as societal and industry benefits, etc.
- Define criteria for how different values are considered.
- Identify and explain the impact/benefit of our built environment, taking into account that both private and public actors think and act differently depending on whether they are based on a short- or long-term commitment, ie building for long-term ownership or sell-off development.
- Comparing and evaluating stakeholder analysis that highlights various affected parties/actors' incentives and justification of the project. That also identify political challenges related to the planning of the built environment and develop skills to act and communicate with various stakeholders about possible value conflicts.
- Read and use technical texts and scientific articles in a conscious, critical and effective way.
- Sift through, collate and summarize the information gathered, and explain and describe the subject content of the course.
Content
A particular focus is given to client roles, pre-design phase, briefing/programming, investment and stakeholder analysis. The course will develop the student's ability to describe relationships between values in buildings ie for example, how the quality is weighed against costs. The course provides a different way to look at a property's value, partly on a market, as well as an asset for the owner and also its value-creating effects for tenants. Important core processes during a facility's life cycle (both at site level and object level) are stressed in order to highlight opportunities and incentives for real estate development.Organisation
The course includes the following elements:- Lectures; aiming to introduce the literature providing an overview of course relevant theories and concepts. The lectures are not sufficient in themselves to acquiring sufficient theoretical knowledge, hence students are expected to take major responsibility for the reading of literature.
- Individual assignment in the form of analyzes of current development projects providing basic orientation in current practice.
- Project task with the aim of developing own proposals and to develop skills in communicating values in the built environment, both in writing and orally. The project work may also include assessment tasks of other group's results.
Literature
See the course website for current literature and information.Examination including compulsory elements
To pass the course both accepted assignment and approved project task are required.The project task is done in groups and includes a written report, oral presentations and could include opposition of another group's report. The group task aims to synthesize and reflect on the knowledge given in the course.
In addition, participation in mandatory lectures and the presentation of the project task are required.
The level of the final grade depends on the overall rating of the assignment and project work.
The course examiner may assess individual students in other ways than what is stated above if there are special reasons for doing so, for example if a student has a decision from Chalmers on educational support due to disability.