Konferensen riktar sig till Chalmers anställda och studenter och behandlar alla aspekter av högre utbildning; undervisning, lärande, handledning, pedagogiskt ledarskap och studentvägledning.
Översikt
- Datum:Startar 22 april 2025, 08:00Slutar 22 april 2025, 16:30
- Plats:Hörsalen Runan Chalmers tekniska högskola, Chalmersplatsen 4, 412 96 Göteborg, Sverige
- Språk:Svenska och engelska
- Anmäl dig senast:15 april 2025
Huvudtalare
Lisa R. Lattuca: The case for contextualized and interdisciplinary engineering education: From promises to practices
Professor, University of Michigan
Abstract endast på engelska: Employers, educators, and the public need engineers who respond knowledgeably and ethically to the needs of industry, stakeholders, and the communities their work affects immediately and in the future, yet engineering courses often abstract technical knowledge from the context-laden, real-world engineering problems that require definition and sound solutions. Moreover, experience and research suggest that the interdisciplinary and contextual competences needed for responsive and responsible engineering practice take time to develop and deepen. At Chalmers, Tracks options and thoughtfully constructed design and project courses introduce students to interdisciplinary collaboration and problem-solving experiences. Extra-curricular activities can further engage students, although engagement is optional. A question thus arises: How might engineering programmes that seek to cultivate interdisciplinary and habits of mind and contextualized problem solving further integrate this learning into the formal curriculum and promote understanding of the sociotechnical dimension of engineering work? In this talk I draw on research on engineering education to make a case for contextualized and interdisciplinary engineering learning experiences. I also offer suggestions for educational practices and policies that support an educational programme that quite intentionally prepares engineers to work in ways that are responsive to the needs of employers and stakeholders and committed to contributing to an engineered world in which individuals and communities can live and thrive.
Årets program 2025
|
Time |
Runan |
Scania-salen |
Ascom |
Catella |
Lednings-rummet |
Valdemar |
|
08:00 |
Registraton and coffee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:30 |
Welcome by Programme Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:35 |
Introduction by Jörgen Blennow, Vice President of Education |
|
|
|
|
|
|
08:45 |
Keynote Lisa R. Lattuca: The case for contextualized and interdisciplinary engineering education: From promises to practices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
09:45 |
COFFEE BREAK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10:15 |
5. Carl Lindberg and Henrik Berglund: The 3 generic math skills required to work in industry and how to teach them _____________ 27. Leo Lahti and Lisa Lindhe: Hands on Algebra – How Digital and Physical Tools can Enhance Learning in Middle School _____________ 35. Shivesh Kumar: Swinging Pendulums on the Cloud: Digitization of Simulation and Experimental Infrastructure for Feedback-Based Active Learning |
7. Beate Granström and Emilié Sörberg: Vad vi berättar för studenter och vad vi önskar att de visste om AI: Användningen av artificiell intelligens i högre utbildning och dess effekter på pedagogiken 8. Daniel Slunge, Erik Sterner and Viking Lindberg: Exploring AI Integration in Higher Education: Lessons from testing multiple uses in a BsC course
|
Session with keynote speaker Liza R. Lattuca |
31. Anna Nyström Claesson and Ana Carolina Bertassini: Assessing student centered learning without a written exam? A workshop on student centered learning and continuous examination |
30. Samuel Bengmark, Laura Fainsilber and Nina Franzén: Learning Materials for Self-study |
34. Josip Vukusic, Tea Karpefors and Erik Hulthén: Kursutvärderings-enkäternas roll I kvalitetsarbetet |
|
11:15 |
SHORT BREAK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11:30 |
15. Andreas Eriksson: Contribute to increased internationalizzation at Chalmers through Blended Intensive Programmes (BIP) _____________ 9. Christophe Demaziere: Developing Blenden Intensive Programmes (BIP) – Examples from the GRE@T-PIONEeR project _____________ 25. Karine Le Bail: The evolving Role of AI in Education |
18. Heidi Wåxberg and Anna Jälknäs: Skapa en tillgänglig lärmiljö _____________ 28. Peter Hammersberg and Ida Gremyr: Är detta rätt problem att lösa? Om att utbilda ingenjörer till att bli ingenjörer |
33. Susanne Kullberg: Hemtentor och muntor i AI-tider – hot eller möjlighet? |
20. Niklas Karlsson, Kristin Egestål and Jonas Sjöblom: Learning though Dialogue with AI: a New Approach to Online Course Engagement |
23. Thommy Eriksson: Hur kan japanska forskningslabb inspirera till närmare samverkan mellan forskning och utbildning vid Chalmers? |
6. Hugo Landgren, Anna Edmonds, Anders Bark, Torgil Störner, Magnus Axelsson and Sofia Toivonen: Blended Learning Team fyller 10 år – vad behövs i framtiden? |
|
12:30 |
LUNCH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13:30 |
26. Peter Ljunglöf and Alex Gerdes: Creating a printed book as a companion to an online book, rather than the other way around --- 29. Producera digitalt undervisningsmaterial |
3. Christophe Demaziere: Ensuring student completion of preparatory work in flipped classes – example from a TRACKS course _____________ 14. Axel Ringh: Trying flipped classroom and active learning in a large mats course on advanced level |
11. Erik Sterner and Viking Lindberg: Build your own AI course chatbot in 30 minutes: A hands-on workshop to create a first version of a digital study buddy or teaching assistant tailored to a course of your choice |
Pää och Sara |
22. Mikael Enelund, Susanne Ingmansson and Becky Bergman: Enhancing internationalization in Engineering Education: Strategies and Practices |
4. Samuel Bengmark, Dan Paulin and Lena Peterson: Hur vill du att din pedagogiska skicklighet bedöms? |
|
14:30 |
SHORT BREAK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14:45 |
24. Samuel Bengmark, Philip Gerlee and Jonathan Weidow: Why engage in practice-based research in upper secondary school? _____________ 10. Marco L. Della Vedova: Improving coding assignments with partial auto-grading and immediate feedback |
36. Romaric Duvignau: Kahoot vs. Mentimeter for active learning in engineering education – Who won? Who’s next? _____________ 32. Lennart Svensson and Christian Stöhr: Can small closed-book exams save our home assignments in the age of AI? |
13. Per Olof Arnäs, Andreas Jonasson and Kajsa Bengtsson: Använda AI för ökad “studentretention” |
2. Lisa Lindén and Josefin Persdotter: Imploding objects: exploring equality, diversity and inclusion (DEI) in engineering education |
12+21 Erik Sterner, Janneke van der Leer and Martine Buser: Do we need to revisit the purpose of university education in the era of generative AI |
17. Rickard Johanson: Hur kan Chalmers flytta fram positionerna vad gäller examination? |
|
15:45-16:30 |
AVSLUTNING I VOLVO-FOAJÉN Alkoholfritt bubbel och 3 olika slags snittar och snack |
|
|
|
|
|
